نظام حقوقی مطلوب تأمین اجتماعی در پرتو نظریه عدالت آزادی‌گرایان چپ

نظام تأمین اجتماعی / social security system , آزادیگرایی چپ / left libertarianism , عدالت / justice , دولت توانمندساز / enabling state , سرمایه گذاری اجتماعی / social investment , شغل به مثابه دارایی / job as asset , تفاوت در توانایی ها / difference in abilities

فهرست تفصیلی مقدمه 10 «بخش اول: چالش‌های نظام تأمین اجتماعی» 35 فصل اول: وابستگی رفاهی 36 گفتار اول: تأثیرات انگیزه‌ای 38 بند اول: برداشت‌ها از نظریه انتخاب عقلانی 39 الف- انتخاب عقلانی و جامعه آزاد 39 ب- انتخاب عقلانی و جامعه فراگیر 40 بند دوم: تردید در نظریه انتخاب عقلانی 43 گفتار دوم: تغییر در ارزش‌ها 45 بند اول: مبانی فرهنگ وابستگی 47 الف- فرهنگ فقر 47 ب- طبقه زیرین 48 بند دوم: تردید در فرهنگ وابستگی 49 فصل دوم: نقض «اصل عمل متقابل» 51 گفتار اول: برداشت سخت‌گیرانه 52 گفتار دوم: برداشت معتدل 53 فصل سوم: رفتار تبعیض‌آمیز با گروه‌های ضعیف‌تر 55 گفتار اول: دوگانگی در اعمال اصل عمل متقابل 56 گفتار دوم: رفتار برابر با بیکاران 58 گفتار سوم: صلاحیت اختیاری گسترده 59 فصل چهارم: تحدید ناموجه آزادی 60 گفتار اول: قیم‌مآبی 61 گفتار دوم: کمال‌گرایی آزادی‌خواهانه 63 فصل پنجم: بدنام‌سازی 65 گفتار اول: عوامل ایجاد بدنامی 66 بند اول: شرط اشتغال 66 بند دوم: آزمون وسع 67 گفتار دوم: دفاع از بدنام‌سازی 68 «بخش دوم: تحول در مداخلات رفاهی دولت» 70 فصل اول: سرمایه‌گذاری اجتماعی 73 فصل دوم: کاستی‌های سرمایه‌گذاری اجتماعی 76 گفتار اول: مدیریت عمومی نوین 77 گفتار دوم: سرمایه‌گذاری خدمات محور 78 گفتار سوم: شروط اشتغال در برنامه‌های فعال‌سازی 79 فصل سوم: سرمایه‌گذاری اجتماعی در نظام حقوقی ایران 80 گفتار اول: آموزش و توسعه سرمایه انسانی 85 گفتار دوم: سیاست‌های فعال بازار کار 88 الف_توانمندسازی 90 ب_ خود اتکایی و اشتغال 96 گفتار سوم: یگانگی نهادی 100 گفتار چهارم: ارزیابی شاخص‌ها در نظام حقوقی ایران 100 «بخش سوم: نظریه عدالت آزادی‌گرایان چپ» 103 فصل اول: آزادی‌گرایی 104 فصل دوم: نظریه عدالت آزادیگرایان چپ 107 گفتار اول: مالکیت بر خود 108 گفتار دوم: مالکیت برابری‌گرایانه منابع طبیعی 110 بند اول: آزادیگرایی چپ سهم برابر 112 بند دوم: آزادی‌گرایی چپ فرصت برابر 115 الف- شبه دولت 116 ب- اولویت اراده‌گرایی بر نفع‌گرایی 117 فصل سوم: اقتضائات عدالت در نظریه عدالت آزادی‌گرایان چپ 118 گفتار اول: تفاوت در توانایی‌ها 120 بند اول: کم برخوردارترین‌ها 121 بند دوم: تفاوت در استعدادهای درونی 123 گفتار دوم: شغل به مثابه دارایی 126 بند اول: مالیات بر اشتغال 127 گفتار سوم: میراث مشترک 128 بند اول: ترکه 128 بند دوم: تکنولوژی 129 گفتار چهارم: کاستی بازار 130 «بخش چهارم: دولت و الگوی مطلوب تأمین اجتماعی» 132 فصل اول: توسعه مفهومی دولت توانمندساز 136 گفتار اول: دولت تضمین‌گر 136 بند اول: دولت تضمین‌گر و مدیریت عمومی نوین 137 بند دوم: دولت تضمین‌گر و تنظیم‌گری 139 گفتار دوم: دولت رفاه تنظیم‌گر 140 بند اول: نظام مستمری 142 الف- تضمین دسترسی 145 ب- دسترسی برابر 147 بند دوم: نظارت قضایی 149 گفتار سوم: دولت رفاه جدید 151 بند اول: سالمندی 154 بند دوم: اشتغال 155 بند سوم: کودکان 156 بند چهارم: زنان 156 فصل دوم: نظام حقوقی مطلوب تأمین اجتماعی 158 گفتار اول: چهارچوب نظری 159 بند اول: کارکرد توانمندسازی 160 بند دوم: منطق توزیعی 161 الف- برابری و مسئولیت فردی 163 ب- برابری در فرصت‌ها 165 گفتار دوم: الگوی مطلوب تأمین اجتماعی 167 بند اول: دولت سازگار 168 نتیجه‌گیری 172 فهرست منابع 177 الف. منابع فارسی 177 ب. منابع انگلیسی 179 پیوست 196 بخش یک 196 بخش دو 205 بخش سه 208 بخش چهار 210 واژه‌نامه توصیفی 214

الف. منابع فارسی 1- کتب فارسی: 1) استوار سنگری، کورش (1390)، حقوق تأمین اجتماعی، تهران، میزان. 2) امامی، محمد؛ استوار سنگری، کورش(1393)، حقوق اداری، جلد اول، تهران، میزان. 3) راسخ، محمد (1398)، پیشگفتار ویراست دوم ترجمه، در تاریخ مختصر تئوری حقوقی در غرب، جان کلی، تهران، نشر نی. 4) لاگلین، مارتین (2004)، مبانی حقوق عمومی، ترجمه محمد راسخ (1391)، تهران، نشر نی. 5) نوزیک، رابرت (1395)، بی‌دولتی، دولت، آرمانشهر، ترجمه محسن رنجبر، تهران، مرکز. 6) همتی، مجتبی (1396)، حقوق تأمین اجتماعی، تهران، دانشگاه علوم قضایی و خدمات اداری. 2- مقالات فارسی: 7) آزاددوین، علی؛ کاشانی، جواد(1397)، «چالش‌های فراروی اجرای حق تأمین اجتماعی به عنوان یک حق بشری»، پژوهش حقوق عمومی، شماره 60، صص. 9-35. 8) امیدوار، سیروس (1400)، «گذار از رانت‌های نفت و گاز دولتی به درآمد پایه همگانی و رشد اقتصادی»، پژوهشنامه اقتصاد انرژی ایران، دوره 10 شماره 38، صص. 11-63. 9) استاینر، هیلل (1974)، «مفهوم عدالت»، در حق و مصلحت: مقالاتی در فلسفه حقوق، فلسفه حق فلسفه ارزش، راسخ، محمد(1391)، صص. 317-346. 10) حبیب نژاد، سید احمد؛ سلمانی سیبنی، مرضیه (1399)، «نسبت سنجی نظریه دولت رفاه و نظام حقوقی جمهوری اسلامی ایران در حوزه فقر زدایی»، فصلنامه علمی پژوهش های نوین حقوق اداری، سال دوم، شاره پنجم، صص.59-88. 11) رحمانی، علی؛ هاشمی، سید محمد (1397)، «حمایتهای اجتماعی در کار شایسته با تأکید بر نظام های بیمه اجتماعی و چالشهای فراروی آن در نظام تأمین اجتماعی ایران»، فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی رفاه اجتماعی، شماره 69، صص. 9-54. 12) رنانی، محسن، (1382)، «تأمین اجتماعی و دموکراسی»، فصلنامه تأمین اجتماعی، شماره 13، ص. 331-342. 13) صفری شالی، رضا؛ ابراهیمی، مریم(1400)، «سیاست های رفاهی متناسب با مخاطرات اجتماعی»، مسائل اجتماعی ایران، سال 11، شماره 1،صص. 85-115. 14) عموزاده مهدیرجی، حنیف (1394)، «دولت سرمایه گذار اجتماعی در ایران مقایسه تطبیقی استراتژی لیسبوناتحادیه اروپا و سیاستهای رفاهی دولت جمهوری اسلامی ایران»، ارائه شده در اولین کنفرانس علوم اجتماعی و جامعه شناسی، شیراز. 15) مردیها، مرتضی (1399)، «دولت رفاه و دوگانه سوسیال دموکراسی- لیبرال دموکراسی»، فصلنامه دولت پژوهی، سال پنجم، شماره 21 ، صص. 29-57. 16) واعظی، مجتبی (1399)، «مفهوم تحلیلی اداره و مدل های آن»، پژوهشنامه حقوق تطبیقی، دوره چهارم، شماره 5، ص.324. 17) ولنتاین، پیتر(نامشخص)، «لیبرتاریانیسم»، ترجمه محمد زمان زمانی جمشیدی(1392)، کتاب ماه فلسفه، شماره 78، صص. 87-93. 18) یاوری، اسد الله (1393)، «درآمدی بر مفهوم تنظیم‌گری حقوقی»، مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، دوره 5، شماره 2، صص. 629- 647. 3- تقریرات درسی: 19) راسخ، محمد(1386)، تقریرات درس حقوق مالی، دوره کارشناسی ارشد حقوق عمومی، دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه شهید بهشتی. 4- پایان نامه‌ها: 20) جوشن لو، حسین، (1391)، نئولیبرالیسم و سیاست های حقوقی-اقتصادی نظام جمهوری اسلامی ایران، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد حقوق اقتصادی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی. 21) خورشیدی، مژگان (1388)، مداخله دولت در اقتصاد در چارچوب نظام حقوقی برنامه توسعه در پرتو نظریه های اقتصاد سیاسی، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد حقوق عمومی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی. 5- منابع الکترونیک 22) مسعود اصل، ایروان(1388)، نظام رفاه اجتماعی در جهان: مطالعه تطبیقی، مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی، ص. 16. https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/book_pub/show/836986

23) Alcock, Pete (1998), Welfare and Self-interest, in Stakeholder Welfare, Alan Deacon (Edt.), 47-60, London: IEA Health and Welfare Unit. 24) Bane, Mary Jo &, Elwood, David T. (1995), Welfare realities: from rhetoric to reform, Cambridge: Harvard university press. 25) Barbier, J.C. (2004), National System of Social Protection in Europe: two contrasted paths to activation, and maybe a third, in Labor and Employment Regulation in Europe. J. Lind, H. Knudsen and H. Jorgensen (Eds.). 233-253. Brussel: Peter Lang. 26) Barbier, J.C. (2017), Social Ivestment: With or Against Social Protection?, in The Uses of Social Investment, A. Hemerijck (Edt.). 51-59. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 27) Barry, Norman P. (2020) The New Right, New York, Routledge. 28) Berner, Frank, (2011), New Private Pension in Germany: A Pension Market or Branch of the Welfare State? Contested Regulatory Issues, in The New Regulatory State: Regulating Pension in Germany and UK, Lutz Leisering (Edt.), 127-149, London :Palgrave Macmillan. 29) Birnbaum, Simon (2012), Basic Income Reconsidered: Social Justice, Liberalism, and the Demands of Equality, New York: PALGARVE MACMILLAN. 30) Bonoli, Giuliano (2012), Active Labour Market Policy and Social Investment: a changing relationship, in Toward a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges, N. Morel, J. Palme, B. Palier (Eds.), 181-204, Bristol: Policy Press. 31) Bonoli, Giuliano, Cantillon, Bea, Val Lancker, Wim, (2017), Social Investment and Matthew Effect, in The Uses of Social Investment, A. Hemerijck (Edt.). 66-76, First Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 32) Christmas, Billy (2022), Force and Coercion, in The Routledge Companion to Libertarianism, M. Zwolinski &, B. Fergusen (Eds.), New York: Routledge. 33) Davy, Ulrike, (2011), Social Europe in Old-Age Security? EU Policies of Public and Private Pensions, in The New Regulatory State: Regulating Pension in Germany and UK, Lutz Leisering (Edt.), 153-174, London: Palgrave Macmillan. 34) Deacon, Alan (2002), Perspective on Welfare: Ideas, Ideologies &, Policy Debate, Buckingham: Open University Press. 35) Dean, Hartly, Taylor-Gooby P. (2013), Dependency culture, New York: Routledge. 36) Esping-Anderson, Gosta (2002a), A Child-Centered Social Investment Straregy, in Why We Need a New Welfare State, G. Esping-Anderson, D. Gallie, A. Hemerijck, J. Myles, 26-67, New York: Oxford University Press. 37) Esping-Anderson, Gosta (2002b), Toward the Good Society, Once Again?, in Why We Need a New Welfare State, G. Esping-Anderson, D. Gallie, A. Hemerijck, J. Myles,1-25, New York: Oxford University Press. 38) Field, Frank (1998), A Rejoinder, in Stakeholder Welfare, Alan Deacon (Edt.), London: IEA Health and Welfare Unit. 39) Field, Frank (2017), Making Welfare Work: Reconstructing Welfare for the Millennium, New York: Taylor and Francis. 40) Fleischer, M.P. (2019), Libertarian Perspective on Basic Income, in The Palgrave International Handbook of Basic Income, M.Torry (Edt.), 439-458, Switzerland: Palgrave. 41) Gallie, Duncan, (2002), The Quality of Working Life in Welfare Strategy, in Why We Need a New Welfare State, G. Esping-Anderson, D. Gallie, A. Hemerijck, J. Myles, 96-129, New York: Oxford University Press. 42) Giddens, Anthony (2003), The Progressive Manifesto: New Ideas for the Center-Left, Cambridge: Policy Network. 43) Gilbert, N. (2002) Transformation of Welfare State: The Silent Surrender of Public Responsibility. First Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 44) Green, David G. (1998), Welfare and Civil Society, in Stakeholder Welfare, Alan Deacon (Edt.), 75-92, London: IEA Health and Welfare Unit. 45) Hausermann, Silja (2012), The Politics of Old and New Social Politics, in The Politics of New Welfare State, Giuliano Bonoli, David Natali (Eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. 46) Hausermann, Silja, Bruno Palier (2017), The Politics of Social Investment, in The Uses of Social Investment. A. Hemerijck (Edt.), 339-348, First Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 47) Hemerijck, Anton (2002), The Self-Transformation of the European Social Models, in Why We Need a New Welfare State, G. Esping-Anderson, D. Gallie, A. Hemerijck, J. Myles, 173-215, New York: Oxford University Press. 48) Hemerjick, A. (2012), Two or Three Waves of Welfare State Transformation, in Toward a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas Politics and Challenges. N. Morel, B. Palier and J. Palme (Eds.), 33-60, First Ed. Bristol: The Policy Press. 49) Hemerijck, A. (2013), Changing Welfare States, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 50) Hemerijck, Antone (2015), European Welfare State in Motion: from social protection to social investment, in Routledge Handbook of European Politics, Jose M. Magone (Edt.), New York: Routledge. 51)Hemerijck, A. (2017), social investment and its critics, in The Uses of Social Investment, A. Hemerijck (Edt.) ,Oxford: Oxford University Press. 52) Jenson, J. (2009) Redesigning Citizenship Regimes after Neoliberalism: Moving Toward Social Investment, in What Future for Social Investment. N. Morel, B. Palier and J. Palm (Eds.),27-45, Stockholm: Digaloo. 53) Katz, Michael B. (1993), The Urban Underclass as a Metaphor of Social Transformation, in The Underclass Debate: Views From History, M.B., Katz (Edt.), 3-24, Princeton: Princeton University Press. 54) Larsen, Christian Albert (2016), The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitude: How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support, New York: Routledge. 55) Leisering, Lutz (2011a), Afterword: Rethinking the Nation State, in The New Regulatory State: Regulating Pensions in Germany and the UK, Lutz Leisering (Edt.), 289-312, London: Palgrave Macmillan. 56) Leisering, Lutz (2011c), Varieties of the New Regulatory State: Comparing the UK and Germany, in The New Regulatory State: Regulating Pension on Germany and UK, Lutz Leisering (Edt.), 275-288, London: Palgrave Macmillan. 57) Leisering, Lutz, Mabbet, Deborah (2011), Toward a New Regulatory State in Old-Age Security? Exploring the Issues, in The New Regulatory State: Regulating Pension on Germany and UK, Lutz Leisering (Edt.), 1-28, London: Palgrave Macmillan. 58) Lister, Ruth (2004), The Third Way Social Investment State, in Welfare State Change Toward a Third Way? J. Lewis and R. Surender (Eds.), First Ed. 157-181, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 59) Marschallek, Chtistian, (2011), Back to the State? The Public Policies of Private and Public Pensions in Britain, in The New Regulatory State: Regulating Pension on Germany and UK, Lutz Leisering (Edt.), 103-126, London: Palgrave Macmillan. 60) Mascini, Peter, Soentken, Menno, Veen, Romke van der (2012), “From Welfare to Workfare: The Implementation of Workfare Policies”, in The Transformation of Solidarity: Changing Risks and the Future of the Welfare State, Van der Veen, R., Yerkes, M., Achterberg, P. (Eds.) 165-190, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 61) Mead, Lawrence M. (1986), Beyond Entitlement: The Social Obligation of Citizenship, New York: The Free Press. 62) Morel, Nathalie, Bruno Palier and Joakim Palm. (2012), Beyond Welfare State as We Knew it?, in Toward A Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas Politics and Challenges. N. Morel, B. Palier and J. Palm (Eds.), 1-30, First Ed. Bristol: The Policy Press. 63) Murray, Charles (1984), Losing Ground: American Social Policy 1950-1980, New York: Basic Books. 64) Myles, John (2002), A New Social Contract for Elderly, in Why We Need a New Welfare State, Esping-Anderson, G., Gallie, D., Hemerijck, A., Myles J., (Eds.) 130-172, New York: Oxford University Press. 65) Newman, J. (2004), Modernizing the State: A New Style of Governance, in Welfare State Change: Toward a Third Way, Lewis, J., Surender R., (Eds.), 69-88, First Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 66) Pas-Fuchs, Amir (2008), Welfare to Work: Conditional Rights in Social Policy, New York: Oxford University Press. 67) Pinker, Robert (1971), Social Theory &, Social Policy, London: Heinemann Educational Book. 68) Prein, Gerald &, Buhr, Petra (1998), Does Welfare Leads to Dependency, in Towards more democracy in social services: models and culture of welfare, Gabby Flosser &, Hans-Uwe Otte (Eds.), 75-91, Berlin: De Gruyter. 69) Rainwater, Lee (1982), Stigma in Income-Tested Programs, in Income Tested Transfer Programs: The Case for and Against, Garfinkel, I., (Edt.), 19-65, New York: Academic Press. 70) Reisman, David (2001), Richard Titmuss: Welfare and Society, New York: Palgrave. 71) Rawls, John (1971), A Theory of Justice: Original Edition, London: Harvard University Press. 72) Steiner, Hillel, Vallentyne, Peter (2009), Libertarian Theories of Intergenerational Justice, in Intergenerational Justice, A. Gosseries &, L.H. Meyer (Eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. 73) Steiner, Hillel (1992), Three Just Taxes, in Arguing for Basic Income, P. Van Parijs(Edt.), Verso, London. 74) Steiner, Hillel (1994), An Essay on Rights, Oxford: Blackwell. 75) Steiner, Hillel (2002), Silver Spoons and Golden Genes: Talent Differentials and Distributive Justice, in The Moral and Political Status of Children, David Archard &, Colin M. Macleod (Eds.), 183-194, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 76) Steiner, Hillel (2022), Left Libertarianism, in The Routledge Companion to Libertarianism, M.Zwolinski &, B.Fergusen (Eds.), New York: Routledge. 77) Titmuss, Richard M. (1968), Commitment to Welfare, New York: Pantheon Books. 78) Vallentyne, Peter (2000), Left-Libertarianism: A Primer, in Left-Libertarianism and Its Critics, Hillel Steiner &, Peter Vallentyne (Eds), New York: PALGRAVE. 79) Vallentyne, Peter (2018), Libertarianism and Taxation, in Taxation: Philosophical Perspective, M. O’Neill &, S. Orr (Eds.), 98-110, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 80) Vandenbrouvke, Frank (2002), Foreword, in Why We Need a New Welfare State, G. Esping-Anderson, D. Gallie, A. Hemerijck, J. Myles, New York: Oxford University Press. 81) Van Parijs, Philippe (1992), Competing Justification of Basic Income, in Arguing for Basic Income: Ethical Foundations for a Radical Reform, Philippe Van Parijs (Edt.), 3-29, London: Verso. 82) Van Parijs, Philippe (1997), Real Freedom for All: What if anything can justify capitalism, Oxford: Claronden. 83) Van Parijs, Phillipe (2009), Egalitarian Justice, Left Libertarianism and The Market, in Anatomy of Justice: Themes from the Political Philosophy of Hillel Steiner, I.Carter, S.D.Wijze &, M.Kramer (Eds.), London: Routledge. 84) Van der Veen, Robert (2013), The Morality of Universal Grant Versus the Ethics of Paid Work, in Basic Income: An Anthology of Contemporary Research, Karl Widerquist, Jose Antonio Nougera, Yannick Vanderborght &, Jurgen De Wispelaere, (Eds.),134-141, UK: Blackwell. 85) Watts, Beth, Fitzpatrick, Suzanne (2018), Welfare Conditionality, New York: Routledge. 86) White, Stuart (2003), The Reciprocity Principle, in The Civic Minimum: On the Rights and Obligations of Economic Citizenship, 49-76, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 87) Widerquist, Karl (2013), Introduction: Reciprocity and Exploitation, in Basic Income: An Anthology of Contemporary Research, Karl Widerquist, Jose Antonio Nougera, Yannick Vanderborght &, Jurgen De Wispelaere, (Eds.), UK: Blackwell. 88) Wilson, William Julius (1987), The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass and Public Policy, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 89) Zwolinski, Matt, Fergusen, Benjamin (2022), The Routledge Companion to Libertarianism, New York: Routledge. 2- مقالات انگلیسی 90) Anderson, Elizabeth (2004), “Welfare, Work Requirements, and Dependent-Care”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 243-256. 91) Arneson, Richard J. (2010), “Self Ownership and World Ownership: Against Left Libertarianism”, Social Philosophy and Policy, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 168-194. 92) Baumberg Geiger, Ben (2016), “The Stigma of Claiming Benefits: A Quantitative Study”, Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 181-199. 93) Benish, A., Haber, H., Eliahoi, R. (2017), “The Regulatory Welfare State in Pension Markets: Mitigating High Charges for Low-Income Savers”, Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 313-330. 94) Benish, Avishai, Levi-Faur, David (2020), “The Expansion of Regulation in Welfare Governance”, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 691, No. 1, pp. 17-29. 95) Bidadanure, Juliana (2019), “The Political Theory of Universal Basic Income”, Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 22, pp. 481-501. 96) Bonvin, J.M., Farvaque, N. (2004), “Social Opportunities and Individual Responsibility: The Capability Approach and the Third Way”, Ethics and Economics, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 1-25. 97) Bonvin, J.M., Otto, H.O., Wohlfarth, A., Ziegler, H. (2018) “The Rise of Welfare Service State: Conceptual challenge of an ambiguous welfare settlement and the need for new policy research”, Social work &, Society, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 1-16. 98) Briggs, Asa (1961), “The Welfare State in Historical Perspective”, European Journal of Sociology, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 221-258. 99) Buckley, F.H. (2005), “Perfectionism”, Supreme Court Economic Review, Vol. 13, pp. 133- 163. 100) Cantillon, B., VanLancker, W. (2013), “Three Shortcomings of the Social Investment Perspective”, Social Policy &, Society, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 553-564. 101) Choi, Y.J., Huber, E., Kim, W.S., Kwon, H.Y., Shi, S.J. (2020), “Social Investment on Knowledge-base Economy: New Politics and Policies”, Policy and Society, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 147-170. 102) Deeming, C., Smyth, P., (2015) “Social Investment After Neoliberalism, Policy Paradigms and Political Platform”, Journal of Social Policy, Vol 44, No. 2, pp. 297-318. 103) Diamond, P., Lodge, G. (2014), “Dynamic Social Security after the Crises: Toward a New Welfare State”, International Social Security Review, Vol. 67, pp. 37-59. 104) Fisher, Arabella (2014), “A Left Libertarian Proposal for Egalitarian World Ownership”, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 1-21. 105) Freeman, Lance (2010), “Interpreting the Dynamics of Public Housing: Cultural and Rational Choice Explanations”, Housing Policy Debate, Vol.9, No. 2, pp. 323-353. 106) Friedli, Lynne, Stearn, Robert (2015), “Positive affect as coercive strategy: conditionality, activation and the role of psychology in UK government workfare program”, Critical Medical Humanities, Vol. 41, pp. 40-47. 107) Gregson, Nicky (1992), “The Underclass: a class apart?”, Critical Social Policy, Vol. 12, No. 34, pp. 38-51. 108) Goodin, Robert E. (2002), “Structures of Mutual Obligation”, Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 323- 353. 109) Haber, Hanan (2011), “Regulating for Welfare: A Comparative Study of Regulatory Welfare Regimes”, Law &, Policy, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 116-148 110) Handler, Joel F. (2008), “The Rise and Spread of Workfare, Activation, Devolution and Privatization and the Changing Status of Citizenship”, Public Law &, Legal Theory Research Paper Series, No. 08-05, pp. 1-55. 111) Harris, Neville (2010), “Conditional rights benefit reform and drug users: reducing dependency”, Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 233-263. 112) Hemerijck, Anton (2014), “Social investment ‘stocks’, ‘flows’ and ‘buffers’”, Politiche Sociali, Vol.1, pp. 9-26. 113) Henning, Christoph (2009), “Liberalism, Perfectionism and Workfare”, Analyse &, Kritik, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 159- 180. 114) Kampen, Thomas, Vekldboer, Lex, Kleinhans, Reinnout (2019), “The Obligation to Volunteer as Fair Reciprocity? Welfare Recipients’ Perceptions of Giving Back to Society” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Vol. 30, pp. 991- 1005. 115) Kimenyi, Mwangi S. (1991), “Rational Choice Culture of Poverty and the Intergenerational Transmission of Welfare Dependency”, Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 947-960 116) Kuitto, Kati (2016), “From Social Security to Social Investment: compensating and social investment welfare policies in a life course perspective”, Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 446-447. 117) Leisering, Lutz (2011b), “Pension Privatization in a Welfare State Environment: Socializing Private Pensions in Germany and the United Kingdom”, Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 139-151. 118) Levi-Faur, D. (2013), “The Odyssey of the Regulatory State: From a Thin Monomorphic Concept to a Thick and Polymorphic Concept”, Law &, Policy, Vol. 35, pp. 29-50. 119) Levi-Faur, D. (2014), “The Welfare State: A Regulatory Perspective”, Public Administration, Vol. 92, No. 3, pp. 599- 614. 120) Levin, Andrew (1995), “Fairness to Idleness: Is There a Right Not to Work?”, Economics and Philosophy, Vol.11, No. 2, pp. 255- 274. 121) Litor, L., Menahem, G., Bar-Mor, H. (2020), “The Rise of the Regulatory Welfare State, Publicization, and Constitutional Social Rights: The Case of Israel and Britain”, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 691, No. 1, pp.189-191. 122) Mawhinney, Alison, Griffits, Lorwerth (2011), “Ensuring That Others Behave Responsibly: Giddens Governance and Human Rights”, Social &, Legal Studies, Vol. 4, No. 20, pp. 481-498. 123) Mckinnon, Catriona (2003), “Basic Income, Self Respect and Reciprocity”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 143- 158. 124) Mead, Lawrence (1997), “Citizenship and Social Policy: T.H. Marshal and Poverty”, Social Philosophy and Policy, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 197- 230. 125) Moffitt, Robert (1983), “An Economic Model of Welfare Stigma”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 73, No. 5, pp. 1023-1035. 126) Molander, Anders, Torsvik, Gaute (2021), “In Their Own Best Interest. Is There a Paternalistic Case for Welfare Conditionality?”, Journal of Social Policy, pp. 191-208. 127) Morris, L.D. (1993), “Is There a British Underclass?”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 404-412. 128) Noguera, Jose A. (2006), “Freedom, Justice and Work: Can Republican Be Against Workfare and Should They?”, in ALSP Annual Conference of Social Justice in Practice, Dublin. 129) Noguera, Jose A. (2007), “Why Left Reciprocity Theories Are Inconsistent”, An International Journal of Basic Income Research, Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 1- 22. 130) O’Connor, Brendon (2001), “The Intellectual Origins of Welfare Dependency”, Australian Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 221-236. 131) Oorschot, Win Van (2000), “Who Should Get What and Why on Deservingness Criteria and the Conditionality of Solidarity Among the Public”, Policy &, Politics, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 33-48. 132) Otsuka, Micheal (1998a), “Self Ownership and Equality: A Lockean Reconciliation”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 27, NO. 1, pp. 65-92. 133) Otsuka, Michael (1998b), “Making the Unjust Provide for the Least Well Off”, The Journal of Ethics, Vol. 2, No. 3, p. 247-248 134) Otsuka, Michael (2006), “How to be a Libertarian without being Inegalitarian”, Raisons Politiques, No. 23, pp. 9-22. 135) Peck, J. Theodor, N. (2000), “Work First: Workfare and the Regulation of Contingent Labor market”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 119-138. 136) Perkins, D., Nelms, L., Smyth, P. (2005), “Beyond Neo-liberalism: the social investment state?”, Just Policy: A Journal of Australian Social Policy, No. 38, pp. 34-41. 137) Quong, Jonathan (2011), “Left Libertarianism: Rawlsian Not Luck Egalitarian”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 64-89. 138) Robinson, Fred &, Gregson, Nicky (1992), “THE Underclass: a Class Apart?”, Critical Social Policy, Vol. 12, No. 34, pp. 38-51. 139) Sardoc, Mitja (2019), “Talents and Distributive Justice: an interview with Hillel Steiner”, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 51, No. 14. 140) Scheffler, Samuel (2005), “Choice, Circumstance and the Value of Equality”, Politics, Philosophy and Economics, Vol. 4, No. 1. 141) Schneider, Saundra, Jacoby, William (2003), “A Culture of dependence? The Relationship Between Public Assistance and Public Opinion”, British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 213-231. 142) Segall, Shlomi (2005), “Unconditional Welfare Benefits and the Principle of Reciprocity”, Politics, Philosophy &, Economics, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 331-354. 143) Steiner, Hillel (1987), “Capitalism, Justice and Equal Starts”, Social Philosophy and Policy, Vol. 5, No. 1, p. 49-71. 144) Steiner, Hillel (1997), “Choice and Circumstance”, Ratio, 10(3), pp. 297-311 145) Steiner, Hillel (1999), “Just Taxation and International Redistribution”, Nomos, Vol. 41, pp. 171-191. 146) Steiner, Hillel (2008), “Debate: Universal Self-Ownership and the Fruits of One’s Labour: A Reply to Curchin”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 350- 355. 147) Steiner, Hillel (2009), “Left Libertarianism and the Ownership of Natural Resources”, Public Reason, Vol 1, No. 1, pp. 152-168. 148) Steiner, Hillel (2011a), “The Global Fund: A Reply to Casal”, Journal of Moral Philosophy, Vol. 8, pp. 328-334. 149)Steiner, Hillel (2011b), “Sharing Mother Nature’s Gifts: A Reply to Qoung and Miller”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp.110-123. 150) Steiner, Hillel (2016), “Compensation for Liberty Lost: left libertarianism and unconditional basic income”, Juncture, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 293-297. 151) Steiner, Hillel (2019), “Asymmetric Information Libertarianism and Fraud”, Review of Social Economy, pp. 94-107. 152) Stuber, Jennifer, Schlesinger, Mark (2006), “Source of Stigma for Means-Tested Government Program”, Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 63, pp. 933- 945. 153) Taylor-Gooby, p. (2011), “Opportunity and Solidarity”, Journal of Social Policy, Vol 3, No. 40. Pp. 453-470. 154) Taylor-Gooby, P., Larsen, T., Kananen, J. (2004), “Market Means and Welfare Ends: the UK welfare state experiment”, Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 573-592. 155) Tyrone C. Cheng &, Celia C. Lo (2014), “an Analysis of Welfare Participation: Rational-Choice Perspective and Group-Threat Hypothesis”, Journal of Social Service Research, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 189-200. 156) Van Parijs, Philippe (2005), “Basic Income: a simple and powerful idea for the twenty-first century”, Politics and Society, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 7-39. 157) Van Parijs, Philippe (2013), “The Universal Basic Income: Why Utopian Thinking Matters, and How Sociologists Can Contribute to It”, Politics &, Society, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 171-182. 158) Vallentyne, Peter (2007), “Libertarianism and the State”, Social Philosophy and Policy, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 187-205. 159) Vallentyne, Peter (2012b), “Libertarianism and the Justice of a Basic Income”, Basic Income Studies, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 1-16. 160) White, Stuart (1997), “Liberal Equality, Exploitation, and the Case for an Unconditional Basic Income”, Political Studies, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 312-326. 161) White, Stuart (2004), “What’s Wrong with Workfare?”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 271-284. 162) White, Stuart (2006), “Reconsidering the Exploitation Objection to Basic Income”, An International Journal of Basic Income Research, Vol. 1, No. 2. pp. 1- 17. 163) Wong, Chack-Kie (1998), “Rethinking Selectivism and Selectivity by Means Test”, The Journal of Sociology &, Social Welfare, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 118-135. 164) Zhidong Zhang, Pengfei, Li, Xiaolong, Huang &, Ke, Jiang (2013), “On The Causes and Counter Measures of Welfare Dependency Problem in China’s Urban Minimum Living Guarantee System”, Paper presented at the International Conference on Advances in Social Science, Humanities and Management ,China, pp. 313- 320. 3- منابع الکترونیک: 165) Birnbaum, Simon (2016), “Basic Income”, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Accessed: January, 5, 2019. https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-116#:~:text=Is%20Basic%20Income%3F-,Basic%20Income%20Defined%20and%20Introduced,evolution%20of%20social%20citizenship%20rights 166) Carney, Terry (2007), “Welfare reform?: following the “work-first” way”, Brotherhood of St Laurence social policy working paper, no. 7, Brotherhood of St Laurence and University of Melbourne Centre for Public Policy, Fitzroy, pp. 1-14. Accessed: April, 27, 2017. https://library.bsl.org.au/jspui/bitstream/1/801/1/Carney_welfare_reform_work-first.pdf 167) Eichhorst, Werner., Hemerjick, Anton and Scalise, Gemma, (2022), Welfare State, Labor Market, Social Investment and the Digital Transformation, in Digitalization and the Welfare State, Busmeyer M.R.. Accessed: April, 21, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192848369.001.0001 168) Gilbert, N. (2005), “The Enabling State? From Public to Private Responsibility for Social Protection”, OECD Social Employment and Migration Working Paper, No. 26, pp. 1-23. Accessed: October, 9, 2018. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5205780_The_Enabling_State_from_Public_to_Private_Responsibility_for_Social_Protection_Pathways_and_Pitfalls 169) Norton, Andy, Conway, Tim, Foster, Mick, Social Protection Concept and Approaches: Implication for Policy and Practice in International Development, Center for Aid and Public Expenditure, Accessed: June, 24, 2023. https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/2999.pdf 170) Spicker, Paula (2011), “Stigma and Social Welfare”, Croom Helm. Accessed: January, 18, 2020. http://www.spicker.uk/books/Paul%20Spicker%20%20Stigma%20and%20Social%20Welfare.pdf 171) Vallentyne, Peter and van der Vossen, Bas, (2014), “Libertarianism” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Accessed: December, 7, 2017. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/libertarianism/ 172) Waldron, Jeremy (2010), “Socioeconomic Rights and Theories of Justice”, New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers, paper 245. Accessed: https://digital.sandiego.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2563&,context=sdlr 173) Wenar, Leif (2021), “Rights”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, E.N. Zalta (Edt.). Accessed: June, 4, 2019. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rights/ 174) Zwolinski, Matt (2007), “Libertarianism”, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1069042